|
American politics has never been a particularly "clean" place when it comes to angry rhetoric and adversarial mudslinging. However, most would probably agree that politics has become more divisive and provocative than in most other eras of history. A new study has found that injecting anger into an election campaign actually motivates supporters to turn out to vote. Researchers from the University of Colorado say that in the short term, anger-based rhetoric spreads more quickly and easily and leads to big gains on Election Day. Researchers Keri Stapilton of the University of Colorado and Ryan Doukins of the US Air Force Academy point out that ordinary people begin to mirror the anger they see in their favorite candidate when they read about these kinds of emotions in media reports. This "emotional contagion" can embolden people who are normally moderate in political conversations, prompting them to go vote.
Politicians want to be re-elected, and Cambodia WhatsApp Number Data anger is a powerful tool that they can use to achieve their goal," says Stapëlton, PhD student in political science. Read also: Thursday horoscope, find out the star forecast for your sign Photo/ Manaj and Ernest Muçi are selected in the lineup of the week in the Turkish Super League During its study, the team observed nearly 1,400 people, representing the entire political spectrum. The researchers showed each of them a collection of new mock stories about a "recent political debate" in which candidates for office had a heated exchange about immigration. The results show, when it comes to politics, that reading something about someone they support being angry makes them angry too.

Participants in the study reported that they were more likely to attend rallies or vote on Election Day. “Anger is a very strong, short-term emotion that motivates people to act. But in the long run it can have far more negative consequences. As there is always the possibility that anger turns into violence" - emphasizes Stapëlton. Anger in politics is nothing new The authors of the study emphasize that the rhetoric of anger is not a recent phenomenon. In fact, they remember that the second president of the USA, John Adams, once called Alexander Hamilton a "fool". Unfortunately, even after 250 years, things may be less civil. The Pee Research Center reported before the 2020 presidential election that "about 9 in 10 Trump and Biden supporters said there would be 'lasting harm' to the nation if the other candidate won.
|
|