Miguel Blesa returns to prison because the judge has taken advantage
The loophole that the Court has not decided on his challenge due to a deadline issue Miguel Blesa, who yesterday was returned to prison by order of Judge Elpidio Silva, "could not even imagine it." This is what sources close to the former president of Caja Madrid say, adding that "he doesn't explain it.According to these sources, Miguel Blesa is perplexed by the fact that most of the initiatives of Clean Hands and Ausbanc (which is presented as a private accusation) are admitted for processing by the judges, and with this they are marking the investigation of many of the summaries now open , as also happens in the Urdangarín case. And, meanwhile, the position of the prosecutor is not taken into account, as has happened in his case. “ Difficult to explain ,” they say.
Blesa's entourage considers that Judge Elpidio Silva has taken his case as a personal matter, and for this reason he has taken the opportunity to send back to prison the loophole in which, due to deadline problems, the document of recusal against him has not yet been resolved. He presented before the Provincial Court of Madrid, in theMiddle East Mobile Number Listinvestigation of the purchase of the Florida bank. In the other case, due to the credit granted to Díaz Ferrán , the magistrate has already been removed from the investigation, after the Provincial Court of Madrid admitted the challenge of Blesa's defense, which accuses the judge of "manifest enmity" in view of the content of the accusation documents. In the other case, the purchase of the Bank of Florida, the Madrid Court has not yet ruled. Sources close to Miguel Blesa highlight that it is being shown that the purchase of Banco de Florida was not a mistake, because Bankia just sold it a few weeks ago, in a difficult economic moment, with capital gains of 180 million euros .
https://cxbdirectory.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/download-2-300x150.jpg
On the contrary, preferred obligations are issued at face value (which is the price the investor pays at the time of purchase) and, only in certain cases, if the financial institution decides to refund the money to the investors, although, In recent years, it has done so at lower percentages (between 30% and 50%) with respect to the initial investment. -- The Investment Funds are assets separate from the balance sheet of the Manager that manages them and, of course, also from the financial group to which that Manager may belong (article 3 of Law 35/2003, of November 4). Therefore, in the event of a possible situation of insolvency or bankruptcy , either of the Manager or of the financial entity to which the Manager may belong, the investments of the participants channeled through Investment Funds remain outside of this process, with investors being able to dispose of their money if they deem it appropriate at any time.
頁:
[1]